Last Updated December 1, 2008

 

Back to the Protoball Home Page

 

Back to the Full Protoball Chronology

 

 

 

Wicket

 

A Working Chronology

 

Note:  This list was derived from version 10 of the full Protoball Chronology, which was uploaded in December 2008.  (Search term: wicket)  Additional relevant entries may have been added to any later versions of the full Chronology; not all entries on this subchronology are necessarily identical to those on the most recently updated full Chronology.  Readers are encouraged to suggest or perform updates.  Please send notes about omissions, mistakes, typos, etc, to lmccray@mit.edu.

 

 

-----

 

 

1704.1 – Traveler Observes Ball-Playing in CT

 

Madame Knight, “in her inimitable journal of her ride from Boston to New York in 1704, speaks of ball-playing in Connecticut.”

 

“The Game of Wicket and Some Old-Time Wicket Players,” in George Dudley Seymour, Papers and Addresses of the Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut, Volume II of the Proceedings of the Society, [n. p., 1909.] page 284.  Submitted by John Thorn, 7/11/04.  John notes 9/3/2005 that Seymour observes that Madame Knight does not specifically name the sport as wicket, but he excludes cricket as a possibility because cricket was not then known to have been played in America before 1725; however, John adds, we now have a cricket reference in Virginia from 1709.

 

1725c.1 – Wicket Played on Boston Common

 

“Sam. Hirst got up betimes in the morning, and took Ben Swett with him and went into the (Boston) Common to play at Wicket. Went before any body was up, left the door open; Sam came not to prayer; at which I was most displeased.”

 

Per George Dudley Seymour, Papers and Addresses of the Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut, Volume II of the Proceedings of the Society [n.p., 1909.], page 277.  From John Thorn, 7/11/04: This quote is not found in Samuel Sewall's Diary, Mark Van Doren, editor [Macy-Masius, New York, 1927]. It may be in M. Halsey Thomas, ed., The Diary of Samuel Sewall, 1674-1729 , 2 vols. (New York, 1973 )., which I don't have. Note: confirmation or disconfirmation would be welcome from you wicket fans.

 

1766.2 -- Cricket Challenge in CT

 

“A Challenge is hereby given by the Subscribers, to Ashbel Steel, and John Barnard, with 18 young Gentlemen . . . to play a Game of BOWL for a Dinner and Trimmings . . . on Friday next.”  Connecticut Courant , May 5, 1766, as cited in John A. Lester, A Century of Philadelphia Cricket [University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1951], page 6.  Note:  is “game of bowl” a common term for cricket?  Could this have been a wicket challenge?

 

1778.4 – Ewing Reports Playing “At Base” and Wicket at Valley Forge

 

George Ewing, a Revolutionary War soldier, tells of playing a game of “Base” at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania: “Exercisd in the afternoon in the intervals playd at base.”  Note: It is doubtful that this was a ball game.

 

Ewing also wrote: "This day [May 4, 1778] His Excellency [i.e., George Washington] dined with G Nox and after dinner did us the honor to play at Wicket with us." ||13||

 

Ewing, G., The Military Journal of George Ewing (1754-1824), A Soldier of Valley Forge [Private Printing, Yonkers, 1928], pp 35 [“base”] and 47 [wicket].  Also found at John C. Fitzpatrick, The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745-1799. Volume: 11. [U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1931]. page 348.  Submitted by John Thorn, 10/12/2004.

 

1778.6 -- NH Loyalist Plays Ball in NY; Mentions “Wickett

 

The journal of Enos Stevens, a NH man serving in British forces, mentions playing ball seven times from 1778 to 1781.  Only one specifies the game played in terms we know: “in the after noon played Wickett” in March of 1781.  C. K. Boulton, ed., “A Fragment of the Diary of Lieutenant Enos Stevens, Tory, 1777-1778,” New England Quarterly v. 11, number 2 (June 1938), pages 384-385, per Altherr reference #33.  Tom notes that the original journal is at the Vermont Historical Society in Montpelier VT.

 

1779.2 – Lieutenant Reports Playing Ball, and Playing Bandy Wicket

 

“Samuel Shute, a New Jersey Lieutenant, jotted down his reference to playing ball in central Pennsylvania sometime between July 9j and July 22, 1779; ‘until the 22nd, the time was spent playing shinny and ball’ Incidentally, Shute distinguished among various sports, referring elsewhere in his journal to ‘Bandy Wicket.’ He did not confuse baseball with types of field hockey [bandy] and cricket [wicket] that the soldiers also played.”  -- Thomas Altherr.  Note: Gomme says that “bandy wicket” was a name for cricket in England. [XXX add cite here]

 

[Shute, Samuel], “Journal of Lt. Samuel Shute,” in Frederick Cook, ed., Journals of the Military Expedition of Major General John Sullivan against the Six Nations of Indians in 1779 [Books for Libraries Press, Freeport NY, reprint of the 1885 edition], p. 268. Per Altherr ref # 28.

 

1786.2 -- Game Called Wicket Reported in England

 

“The late game of Wicket was decided by an extraordinary catch made by Mr. Lenox, to which he ran more than 40 yards, and received the ball between two fingers.”  Morning Post and Daily Advertiser (London), 6/27/1786.  Provided by Richard Hershberger, email of 2/3/2008.  Richard adds: “I know of only one other English citation of “wicket” as the name of a game.  I absolutely do not assume that it was the same as the game associated with Connecticut.”

 

1787.2 – VT Man’s Letter Says “Three Times is Out at Wicket

 

Levi Allen to Ira Allen, July 7, 1787, in John J. Duffy, ed., Ethan Allen and His Kin, Correspondence, 1772 – 1819 [University Press of New England, Hanover NH, 1998], volume 1, p. 224. Per Altherr ref # 75.

 

1790s.6  – Cricket as Played in Hamburg Resembled the U.S. Game of Wicket? 

 

“[D]escriptions of the game [cricket] from Hamburg in the 1790s show significant variations often quite similar to outdated provisions of American “Wicket,” which may well not be due to error on the part of the author, but rather to acute observation.  For example, the ball was bowled alternatively from each end (i.e. not in ‘overs’).  Moreover, the ball has to be ‘rolled’ and not ‘thrown’ (i.e., bowled in the true sense, not the pitched ball).  And the striker is out if stops the ball from hitting the wicket with his foot or his body generally.  There is no more reason to believe that there was uniformity in the Laws coverning cricket in England, the British Isles, or in Europe than there was in weights and measures.”  Rowland Bowen, Cricket: A History of its Grown and Development Throughout the World (Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, 1970), page 72.  Note:  Bowen does not give a source for this observation.

 

 

1791.1 – “Bafeball” Among Games Banned in Pittsfield MA – also Cricket, Wicket

 

In Pittsfield, Massachusetts, to promote the safety of the exterior of the newly built meeting house, particularly the windows, a by-law is enacted to bar “any game of wicket, cricket, baseball, batball, football, cats, fives, or any other game played with ball,” within eighty yards of the structure. However, the letter of the law did not exclude the city’s lovers of muscular sport from the tempting lawn of “Meeting-House Common.” This is the first indigenous instance of the game of baseball being referred to by that name on the North American continent. It is spelled herein as bafeball.  Pittsfield is baseball’s Garden of Eden,” said Mayor James Ruberto.

 

Per John Thorn:  The History of Pittsfield (Berkshire County),Massachusetts, From the Year 1734 to the Year 1800. Compiled and Written, Under the General Direction of a Committee, by J. E. A. Smith. By Authority of the Town. [Lea and Shepard, 149 Washington Street, Boston, 1869], 446-447.  The actual documents themselves repose in the Berkshire Athenaeum. ||16||

 

 

1793.1 -- Engraving Shows Game with Wickets at Dartmouth College

 

A copper engraving showing Dartmouth College appeared in Massachusetts Magazine in February 1793.  It is the earliest known drawing of the College, and shows a wicket-oriented game being played in the yard separating college buildings. The game appears to be wicket, but College personnel ask whether it is not an early form of cricket.  See http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/Library_Bulletin/Nov1992/LB-N92-KCramer2.html; 

 

Submitted by Scott Meacham 8/17/06.

 

1800.2 – John Knox Owns a “Ball Alley” and Racquets Court in NYC, 1800-1803.

 

Item from John Thorn, 6/25/04.  Note: It seems possible that a “ball alley” is for bowling, but wicket was also played on what was termed an alley.

 

1800c.11 – MA Man Recalls Games of Ball in Streets, with Wickets

 

“The sports and entertainments were very simple.  Running about the village street, hither and thither, without much aim . . . . games of ball, not base-ball, as is now [c1857] the fashion, yet with wickets – this was about all, except that at the end there was always horse-racing [p.19]. ..But as to sports and entertainments in general, there were more of them in those days than now.  We had more holidays, more games in the street, -- of ball-playing, of quoits, of running, leaping, and wrestling. [p.21]”

 

Mary E. Dewey, ed., Autobiography and Letters of Orville Dewey, D.D. (Roberts Brothers, Boston, 1883), pages 19 and 21.  Per Thomas L. Altherr, “Chucking the Old Apple: Recent Discoveries of Pre-1840 North American Ball Games,” Base Ball, Volume 2, number 1 (Spring 2008), page 38.  Accessed 11/16/2008 via Google Books search for “’letters of orville.’”  Orville Dewey was born in Sheffield MA in 1794 and grew up there.  Sheffield is in the SW corner of MA, about 45 miles NE of Hartford Connecticut.  Note: [1] the “game of ball” may have been wicket.  [2] There were more holidays in 1800 than in 1857?

 

1818.1 – Yale Student Reports Cricket on Campus

 

A student at Yale University reports that cricket and football are played on campus [need cite].  Lester, however, says that he doubts the student saw English cricket, and that, given that the site is CT, it was probably wicket.  Lester notes that wicket involved sides of 30 to 35 players, and was played in an alley 75 feet long, and with oversized bats.

 

Lester, ed., A Century of Philadelphia Cricket [U Penn Press, Philadelphia, 1951], page 7.

 

1820s.9 – In Middletown CT, “Wicket” Recalled, but Not Base Ball.

 

Delaney, ed., Life in the Connecticut River Valley 1800 – 1840 from the Recollections of John Howard Redfield [Connecticut River Museum, Essex CT, 1988], p. 35.  Per Altherr ref # 82.

 

1825.8 -- Wicket Bat Reported Held in Deerfield MA Collection

 

The Pocumtuck Valley Memorial Association reported that, as of 1908, it retained a wicket bat dating from 1825-30.  Submitted by John Thorn, 1/13/2007.  Note: John is trying to ascertain whether the bat remains in the collection.

 

1830s.5 -- Wicket Played in The Western Reserve [OH]

 

“How far the Connecticut game of wicket has travelled I cannot say, but it is certain that when the Western Reserve region of Ohio was settled from Connecticut, the game was taken along. Our member [of the Connecticut Society of Colonial War], Professor Thomas Day Seymour of Yale, tells me that  wicket was a favorite game of the students at Western Reserve College then located at Hudson Ohio . . . .  ‘Up to 1861,’ he says, ‘the standard games at our college were wicket and baseball, with wicket well in the lead.  This game was in no sense a revival.  A proof of this is the fact that young men coming to college [from?] all over the Reserve were accustomed to the game at home.’”  “The Game of Wicket and Some Old-Time Wicket Players,” in George Dudley Seymour, Papers and Addresses of the Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut, Volume II of the Proceedings of the Society, (n. p., 1909.)  page 289.   Provided by John Thorn, email of 1/29/2008.

 

1830s.12 -- Wicket Ball in Buffalo NY

 

“[The Indians] would lounge on the steps of the ‘Old First Church,’ where they could look at our young men playing wicket ball in from of the church: (no fences there then), and this was a favorite ball ground.”

 

Samuel M. Welch, Home History: Recollections of Buffalo During the Decade from 1830 to 1840, or Fifty Years Since [P. Paul and bro., Buffalo, 1890], page 112.  Submitted by John Thorn 9/13/2006.

 

1833.8 – Untitled Drawing of Ball Game [Wicket?] Appears in Songbook

 

Watts’ Divine and Moral Songs – For the Use of Children [New York, Mahlon Day, 374 Pearl Street, 1836], page 15.  Obtained from the “Origins of Baseball” file at the Giamatti Center in Cooperstown.  David Block, Baseball Before We Knew It, page 196, has found an 1833 edition.

 

A drawing shows five children – a tosser, batter, two fielders, and boy waiting to bat.  The bats are spoon-shaped. The wicket looks more like a cricket wicket than the long low bar in wicket.  Is it wicket?  Base-ball?  Here’s Block’s commentary.  “ . .  .an interesting woodcut portraying boys playing a slightly ambiguous bat-and-ball game that is possibly baseball . . . .  A goal in the ground near the batter might be a wicket, but it more closely resembles an early baseball goal such as the one pictured in A Little Pretty Pocket-Book(see #1744.2, above).

 

1834.6 -- In Wicket, It’s Hartford CT 146, Litchfield CT 126

 

The contest took three “ins.”  “Thus, it appears that the ‘Bantam Players’ ‘barked up the wrong tree.’  The utmost harmony existed, and every one appeared to enjoy the sport.”

 

Connecticut Courant, volume 70, Issue 3618, page 3 [probably reprinted from the Hartford Times.  Submitted by John Thorn 9/29/2006.

 

1840.27 -- Hartford CT Skunks Granville MA at Wicket

 

Wicket Ball – The ball players of this city met those of Granville, Mass. In accordance with a challenge from the latter, at Salmon Brook, about 17 miles from here (half way between the two places) on Wednesday last, for the purpose of trying their skill at the game of “Wicket.”  The sides were made up of 25 men each, and the arrangement was to play nine games, but the Hartford players beating them five times in succession, the game was considered as fairly decided.”  Then the two sides shared dinner.  Pittsfield Sun, July 2, 1840, reprinted from the Hartford Times.  Provided by Richard Hershberger, email of 6/19/2007.

 

1840s.28 -- At Hobart College, “Wicket and Baseball Played in Summer”

 

At upstate NY’s Hobart College in Geneva, “Social events were among the few recreations available; there were no intercollegiate athletics, and no concerted sports at all. . . . wicket and baseball were played in summer, there was skating in winter, and that was about all.”  Warren Hunting Smith, Hobart and William Smith; the History of Two College (Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva NY, 1972), page 123.  Caveat: The author is imprecise about the date of this observation; this passage appears in the chapter “Student Life Before 1860,” and our impression is that he refers to the 1840s . . . but the 1830s or 1850s cannot be ruled out.  Provided by Priscilla Astifan, email of 2/4/2008.  Priscilla notes that this book also details a number of somewhat destructive student pranks and drinking. “When I read about all the pranks and dissipation, carousing, etc., I see why base ball and other sports were considered a welcome diversion when they became popular.”  [Email of 10/22/2008.] 

 

1841.9 -- County-wide Wicket Challenge Issued Near Rochester NY

 

“A CHALLENGE.  The undersigned, Amateur (Wicket) Ball Players, of the Town of Chili, Monroe County, propose, within 20 players, to meet any other Club, or same number of men in this county, and play a game of three ins a side, any time between the first and fifteenth of July next.  The game to be played at Chapman’s corner, eight miles west from Rochester. . . . Chili, June 24, 1841.”  Rochester Republican, June 18, 1841

 

Noted by Priscilla Astifan, 19CBB posting, 1/28/2007.  Priscilla adds:  “Pioneer baseball players’ [in Rochester] memoirs have mentioned Wicket as one of baseball’s early predecessors here and that some of the best pioneer baseball players had been skilled wicket players.

 

1841.10 -- Bloomfield CT Wicket Challenge:  “One Shamble Shall Be Out”

 

“The Ball Players of Bloomfield and vicinity, respectfully invite the Pall Players of the city of Hartford to . . . play at Wicket Ball, the best in nine games for Dinner and Trimmings.  The Rules to be as follows:  [1] The ball to be rolled and to strike the once or more before it reaches the wicket.  [2] The ball to be fairly caught flying or at the first bound. [3] The striker may defend his wicket with his bat as he may choose. [4] One shamble shall be out. [5] Each party may choose one judge or talisman.”

 

Hartford Daily Courant, June 23, 1841, page 3.  Notes: Is the bound rule [2] usual in wicket?  What is rule 3 getting at?  What is rule 4 getting at?

 

1841.17 – Clevelanders Play Ball at Sunset on Water Street

 

A Cleveland OH newspaper writer was moved to respond to reader [Edith] who groused about “infantile sports:”

 

“Playing Ball is among the very first of the ’sports’ of our early years. Who has not teased his grandmother for a ball, until the ‘old stockings’ have been transformed into one that would bound well? Who has not played ‘barn ball’ in his boyhood, ‘base’ in his youth, and ‘wicket’ in his manhood? – There is fun, and sport, and healthy exercise, in a game of ‘ball.’ We like it; for with it is associated recollections of our earlier days. And we trust we shall never be too old to feel and to ‘take delight’ in the amusements which interested us in our boyhood.  If ‘Edith’ wishes to see ‘a great strike’ and ‘lots of fun,’ let her walk down Water Street some pleasant afternoon towards ‘set of sun’ and see the ‘Bachelors’ make the ball fly.

 

Cleveland Daily Herald (April 15, 1841).  Posted to 19CBB on August 21, 2008 by Kyle DeCicco-Carey.  Note:  Are they playing wicket?  Another game?  What types of Clevelanders would have congregated on Water Street?

 

1843.4 -- Wicket at Yale

 

“Were it spring or autumn you should see a brave set-to at football on the green, or a brisk game of wicket.”

 

Belden, Sketches of Yale College [Pubr?, 1843] , per John Lester, A Century of Philadelphia Cricket [UPenn, Philadelphia, 1951], page 7.

 

John Thorn, 6/25/2005, mentions that he has an account of wicket at Yale. Note -- XXX Need to follow up with John Is he referring to the Belden citation?  Does it say any more, or give a view date?.

 

1846.7 – Amherst Juniors Drop Wicket Game, 77 to 53, According to Young Billjamesian

 

“Friday, October 16. At prayers as usual.  Studied Demosthenes till breakfast time.  After breakfast came off the great match between our class and the juniors.  We beat them 77 to 53.  They had on the ground nineteen men out of twenty-nine, and we thirty out of thirty-five. Had the remainder of both classes been there, at the same rate we should have beaten them 90 to 81. As a class they were completely used up. Their players, however, averaged about 0.23 each more than ours. The whole was played out in about an hour. The victory was completely ours, a result different from what I expected. Got a lesson in Demosthenes and went to recitation.”  On October 3, the MA diarist had written: “played a game of wicket, with a party of fellows . . . . Had a fine game, though I, knowing little of the rules, was soon bowled out.  Then cam home and wrote journal till 5PM. Then to prayers and afterward to supper.” 

 

Hammond, William G., Remembrance of Amherst: An Undergraduate's Diary, 1846-1848. [Columbia University Press, New York, 1946], page 26.  Per John Thorn 7/04/2003.  Note: it is conclusive from this excerpt context that the MA students were playing wicket on October 16.

 

1846.8 – Amherst Alum Recalls How Wicket Was Played

 

Dr. Edward Hitchcock gives this account of the game of MA wicket: "In my days baseball was neither a science nor an art, but we played ‘wicket’.  On smooth and level ground about 20 feet apart were placed two 'wickets,' pine sticks 1 inch square and 8 to 10 feet long, supported on a block at each end so as to be easily knocked off. The ball was made of yarn, covered with stout leather, about six inches in diameter and bowled with all the power of the wicket tender at each end. The aim was to roll it as swiftly as possible at the opposite wicket and knock it down if possible. This was defended by the man with a broad bat, 3 feet long, and the oval about 8 inches [broad], who must defend his wicket.  If the bowler could by a fair ball, striking twice between the wickets, knock down the opposite wicket, the striker was out. But if the batter could by a direct or sideways hit send the ball sideways or overhead the outside men, they [ i.e. ., the batter and his teammate at the opposite end] could run till the ball was in the hands of the bowler. But the bowler to get the batter out must with the ball in his hand knock the wicket outwards before the batter could strike his bat outside a line three feet inside the wicket . . . . This game was played on the lowest part of the 'walk' under the trees which now extends from chapel to the church."

 

Hitchcock, Edward, “Recollections,” in George F. Whicher, ed., Remembrance of Amherst: An Undergraduate's Diary, 1846-1848. [Columbia University Press, 1946], page 188. Per John Thorn 7/04.

 

1846.11 -- Suspicious Rochester NY Idler Observed Playing Wicket

 

“You speak . . . of Harrington, the express robber as being in prison here.  This is incorrect.  He isn’t, neither has he been in jail since his arrival here, unless you can call the Eagle Hotel a jail. . . . [W]hen the weather has been pleasant, he has occupied his time in playing wicket in the public square; or playing the fiddle in his room . . . to solace and relieve the tedium of his boredom.”

 

Rochester Police Officer Jacob Wilkinson letter of April 7, 1946, as quoted in “The Express Robbery,” The National Police Gazette, Volume 1, Number 32 [April 18, 1846], page 277.  Submitted by John Thorn, 9/2/2006.  Note: It is possible to construe wicket as a daily Rochester occurrence from this snippet. 

 

1852.10 – Fictional “Up-Country” Location Cites Bass-Ball and Wicket

 

 “Both houses were close by the road, and the road was narrow; but on either side was a strip of grass, and in process of time, I appeared and began ball-playing upon the green strip, on the west side of the road. At these times, on summer mornings, when we were getting well warm at bass-ball or wicket, my grandfather would be seen coming out of his little swing-gate, with a big hat aforesaid, and a cane. He enjoyed the game as much as the youngest of us, but came mainly to see fair play, and decide mooted points.”

 

L.W. Mansfield, writing under the pseudonym “Z. P.,“ or Zachary Pundison, Up-country Letters (D. Appleton and Company, New York, 1852), page 277. Provided by David Block, 2/27/2008.  David notes: “This is a published collection of letters that includes one dated March 1851, entitled ‘Mr. Pundison’s Grandfather.’ In it the author is reminiscing about events of 20 years earlier.”  Note:  It might be informative to learn whether this novel has a particular setting [wicket is only known in selected areas) and where Mansfield lived.  There is a second incidental reference to wicket: “this is why it is pleasant to ride, walk, play at wicket, or mingle in city crowds” . . . [i.e., to escape endless introspection]. Ibid, page 90.

 

1850s.16 -- Wicket Play in Rochester NY

 

“The immediate predecessor of baseball was wickets.  This was a modification of cricket and the boys who excelled at that became crack players of the latter sport of baseball.  In wickets there had to be at least eight men, stationed as follows:  Two bowlers, two stump keepers or catcher, two outfielders and two infielders or shortstops. . . .

 

“The wickets were placed sixty feet apart, and consisted of two ‘stumps’ about six inches in height above the ground and ten feet apart. . . . The ball was as large as a man’s head, and of peculiar manufacture.  Its center was a cube of lead weighing about a pound and a half. About this were tightly wound rubber bands . . . and the whole sewed in a thick leather covering.  This ball was delivered with a stiff straight-arm underhand cast . . . . Three out was side out, and the ball could be caught on the first bound or on the fly.”

 

“Baseball Half a Century Ago,” Rochester Union and Advertiser, March 21, 1903.  Submtted by Priscilla Astifan [date?]

 

1851.3 -- Wicket Players in CT Found Liable

 

“In a recent case which occurred at Great Barrington, an action was brought against some 12 or 15 young men, by an old man, to recover damages for a spinal injury received by him and occasioned by a wicket ball, which frightened his horse and threw him from his wagon.  The boys were playing tin the street. . . . . If this were fully understood, there would be less of the dangerous and annoying practice so common in our streets.”

 

“Caution to Ball Players in the Street,” The Pittsfield Sun, Volume 51, Issue 2647 [June 12, 1851], page 2.  Submitted by John Thorn, 6/10/2006.

 

1854.13 – English Visitor Sees Wicket at Harvard

“It was in the spring of 1854 . . .  that I stepped into the Harvard College yard close to the park. There I saw several stalwart looking fellows playing with a ball about the size of a small bowling ball, which they aimed at a couple of low sticks surmounted by a long stick. They called it wicket. It was the ancient game of cricket and they were playing it as it was played in the reign of Charles the First [1625-1649 -- LMc]. The bat was a heavy oak thing and they trundled the ball along the ground, the ball being so large it could not get under the sticks.

“They politely invited me to take the bat. Any cricketer could have stayed there all day and not been bowled out. After I had played awhile I said, “You must play the modern game cricket.” I had a ball and they made six stumps. Then we went to Delta, the field where the Harvard Memorial Hall now stands. We played and they took to cricket like a duck to water. . . .I think that was the first game of cricket at Harvard.”  “The Boyhood of Rev. Samuel Robert Calthrop.”  Compiled by His Daughter, Edith Calthrop Bump.  No date given. Accessed 10/31/2008 at:

http://www-distance.syr.edu/SamCalthropBoyhoodStory.html.  Actually, Mr. Calthrop may have come along about 95 years too late to make that claim:  see #1760s.1 above.

 

1855c.3 – Wicket, Seen as a CT Game, Was Played in Brooklyn

 

In 1880 the Brooklyn Eagle carried long articles that include a description of the game of wicket, described as a Connecticut game not seen in Brooklyn for about 25 years:

 

“Instead of eleven on a side, as in cricket, there are thirty, and instead of wickets used by cricketers their wickets consist of two pieces of white wood about an inch square and six feet long, placed upon two blocks three inches from the ground.  The ball also differs from that used in cricket or base ball, it being almost twice the size, although it only weighs nine ounces.  The bat also differs from that used in cricket and base ball, it being more on the order of a lacrosse bat, although of an entirely different shape, and made of hard, white wood.  The space between the wickets is called the alley, and is seventy-five feet in length and ten feet in width. Wicket also differs from cricket in the bowling, which can be done from either wicket, at the option of the bowlers, and there is a centre line, on the order of the ace line in racket and hand ball, which is called the bowler’s mark, and if a ball is bowled which fails to strike the ground before it reaches this line it is considered a dead ball, or no bowl, and no play can be made from it, even if the ball does not suit the batsman.  The alley is something on the order of the space cut out for and occupied by the pitcher and catcher of a base ball club, the turf being removed and the ground rolled very hard for the accommodation of the bowlers.”

 

Brooklyn Eagle, August 26 and August 28, 1880. [Pages? Cite for this excerpt?]  Posted to 19CBB by David Ball 7/22/2003.

 

1855c.10 – Wicket Played in HI

 

“One game they all enjoyed was wicket, often watched by small Mary Burbank.  Aipuni, the Hawaiians called it, or rounders, perhaps because the bat had a large rounder end.  It was a forerunner of baseball, but the broad, heavy bat was held close to the ground.”

 

Ethel, Damon M, Sanford Ballard Dole and His Hawaii [Pacific Books, Palo Alto, 1957], page 41, from John Thorn.

 

Through further digging, John Thorn traces the migration of wicket to Hawaii through the Hawaii-born missionary Henry Obookiah.  At age 17, Obookiah traveled to New Haven and was educated in the area.  He died there in 1818, but not before helping organize a ministry [Episcopalian?] to Hawaii that began in 1820. John’s source is the pamphlet Hawaiian Oddities, by Mike Jay [R. D. Seal, Seattle, ca 1960].  [Personal communication, 7/26/04.]

 

1857.27 – Game of Wicket Reaches IA

 

“BALL GAMES IN THE WEST. – It is with pleasure that we observe the gradual progression of these healthy and athletic games westward.  A Wicket Club has recently been organized in Clinton City, Iowa, which is looked on with much favor by the young men of that locality.”  The Clipper [date omitted from clipping book; sequencing suggests June of 1857].  Facsimile provide by Craig Waff, September 2008.

 

1858.26 -- Wicket, as Well as Cricket and Base Ball, Reported in Baltimore

 

“Exercise clubs and gymnasia are spring up everywhere.  The papers have daily records of games at cricket, wicket, base ball, etc.”

 

Editorial, “Physical Education,” Graham’s American Monthly of Literature, art, and Fashion, Volume 53, Number 6 [December 1858], page 495.  Submitted by John Thorn 9/2/2006.

 

1859.24 -- CT State Championship in Wicket Attracts 4000

 

“When Bristol played New Britain at wicket for the championship of the state before four thousand spectators in 1859, the Hartford Press reported that there prevailed ‘the most remarkable order throughout, and the contestants treated each other with faultless courtesy.’”

 

1859.48 – Wicket Club and Base Ball Club Play Demo Matches for Novelty’s Sake

 

“Novel Ball Match – The Buffalo Dock Wicket Club have invited [the Buffalo Niagaras] to play a game of wicket, and a return game of base ball.  It is intended, not as a trial of skill, (for neither club knows anything of the other’s game, and it was expressly stipulated that neither should practice the other’s) but merely for he novelty and sport of the thing; each club expecting to appear supremely ridiculous at the other’s game.”  Buffalo Daily Courier, September 10, 1859.  The Buffalo Morning Express later reported that the Niagaras lost the wicket game, and that attendance was good; the result of the base ball game is not now known.  Provided by Priscilla Astifan, email of 12/7/2008.

 

1860c.11 – Man Played Base Ball and Wicket in CT Before the War

“I am a native of Hartford, Conn., and have, from early boyhood, taken a great interest in all Out Door Sports that are clean and manly.  As a boy I played One, Two, Three, and Four Old Cat; also the old game of “Wicket.”  I remember that before the Civil War, I don’t remember how long, we played base ball at my old home, Manchester, Harford County, Ct.

 

Letter from Philip W. Hudson, Houston Texas, to the Mills Commission, July 23, 1905.

 

1860.30 – CT Wicketers Trounce CT Cricketers --at Wicket

 

Was wicket an inferior game?  “the game [of wicket] certainly reached a level of technical sophistication equal to these two sports [base ball and cricket].  This was clearly demonstrated during a wicket match at Waterbury, Connecticut, in 1860 when a team of local wicket players easily defeated a team of experience local cricket players.” Tom Melville, The Tented Field: the History of Cricket in America (Bowling Green State U Popular Press, Bowling Green OK, 1998), page 10.  Melville cites the source of the match as the Waterbury American (August 31, 1860), page 21.  Note:  Can we locate and examine this 1860 article?

 

-----

 

Back to the Protoball Home Page

 

Back to the Full Protoball Chronology